<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Amd on Hugo Testbed Theme</title>
    <link>https://teachedu.name/tags/amd/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Amd on Hugo Testbed Theme</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://teachedu.name/tags/amd/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>1950X / 5950X / 7950X ▀ SUPER MEGA RETROSPECTIVE WINDOWS 7 BENCHMARK</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/1950x-5950x-7950x-super-mega-retrospective-windows-7-benchmark/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/1950x-5950x-7950x-super-mega-retrospective-windows-7-benchmark/</guid>
      <description>¶ INTRO WORDS Numbers, numbers, numbers &amp;hellip; i say NUMBERS!!!!&#xA;It&amp;rsquo;s been a while since i ran into the craze of pointless benchmarks. And now I&amp;rsquo;m back with the absolute procrastination stuff. Are you happy with this?&#xA;Take a note that 3DMark 03, 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06, 3DMark Vantage [2007], 3DMark 2011 and 3DMark 2021 are not marked by ▒ sign, showing the fact that these programs lost the soul of demoscene and just providing comparison numbers, nothing else.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A QUICK NOTE ON THE RYZEN 7700 ADOPTION PROCESS</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/a-quick-note-on-the-ryzen-7700-adoption-process/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/a-quick-note-on-the-ryzen-7700-adoption-process/</guid>
      <description>Initially, I decided to install Windows Server 2008 R2, attracted by the opportunity to have a server-class operating system with increased I/O throughput in the works. But almost immediately i ran into compatibility problems [no surprise here] with my existing software. Some programs refuse to run because of artificial restrictions [you know licensing mambo-jambo stuff], some of which depend on components that are not present in Windows Server. It&amp;rsquo;s sort of possible to work, but you almost always run into little glitches here and there, even after converting it to a [workstation].</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NEW EPYC 256 THREAD CPU FINALLY REACH WINDOWS 7 CORE COUNT LIMITATION</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/256-thread-epyc-cpu-finally-reach-windows-7-core-count-limitation/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/256-thread-epyc-cpu-finally-reach-windows-7-core-count-limitation/</guid>
      <description>Most of you already know how AMD substitute in terms of cores/threads count intel&amp;rsquo;s pathetic&amp;rsquo;n&amp;rsquo;degenerative CPU evolution into revolution. Drastic changes were brought by [Ryzen] CPUs in consumer market in late 2017. [Threadripper] and [Epyc] lines were introduced later on [for workstation and server market respectively].&#xA;► [128 core / 256 thread Epyc Bergamo CPU]&#xA;It would be nice to see 256 threads in Windows 7 task manager, but i don&amp;rsquo;t think that it is possible due to lack of drivers.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>64-CORES/128-THREADS THREADRIPPER 3995WX WORKSTATION GRADE CPU CONFIRMED TO WORK IN WINDOWS 7</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/64-core-128-thread-threadripper-3995wx-confirmed-to-work-in-windows-7/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/64-core-128-thread-threadripper-3995wx-confirmed-to-work-in-windows-7/</guid>
      <description>Well known Chinese driver modder [Canonkong] confirmed that [64-cores/128-threads Threadripper 3995WX] based upon sWRX8 chipset works flawlessly in Windows 7 environment. Considering the news it looks like that more recent [5995WX] will also work without any issues. So, we have plenty of headroom in terms of system performance. As for me, i have no need to switch to &amp;ldquo;recent operating systems&amp;rdquo; like Windows 10/11.&#xA;Here is brief [confirmation] from the WinRaid forum:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>44 THREADS XEON WORKSTATION AND 32 THREADS OPTERON SERVER RETRO BUILDS</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/44-threads-xeon-workstation-and-32-threads-opteron-server-retro-builds/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/44-threads-xeon-workstation-and-32-threads-opteron-server-retro-builds/</guid>
      <description>&lt;br&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As you already know i fed up using &lt;a href=&#34;https://trackerninja.codeberg.page/post/my-daily-driver-rig-based-upon-ryzen-5950x-running-windows-7&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;[modern Ryzen/Radeon hardware]&lt;/a&gt; and decided to go a bit retro. Cheap Chinese clone mobos and second-hand high-performance cpu&amp;rsquo;s of previous generations induced me to rebuild my workstation and also fool around with Opteron-based server.&#xA;&lt;br&gt;&#xA;Here is &lt;a href=&#34;https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qW1QraucVBm6pHzoD8yUvza9RhgzjQEJ0p78FHJifeY&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;[very detailed spreadsheet comparision]&lt;/a&gt; of almost all available Chinese x79/x89/x99 boards on the market.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1950X / 3100 / 5950X / RADEON VII / 6900XT ▀ WINDOWS 7 MEGA BENCHMARK</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/1950x-3100-5950x-radeon-vii-radeon-6900xt-windows-7-super-mega-benchmark/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/1950x-3100-5950x-radeon-vii-radeon-6900xt-windows-7-super-mega-benchmark/</guid>
      <description>¶ PREFACE NOTE Finally i have won the battle with my laziness and forced myself to complete this so looooooooongish project. Enjoy!&#xA;PS: 3DMark 03, 3DMark 05, 3DMark 06, 3DMark Vantage [2007], 3DMark 2011 and 3DMark 2021 are not marked by ▒ sign, showing the fact that these programs lost the soul of demoscene and just providing comparison numbers, nothing else.&#xA;█ COMPUTER CONFIGURATIONS CPUs: Threadripper 1 1950X / Ryzen 9 5950X / Ryzen 3 3100 GPUs: Radeon VII 16Gb / Radeon 6900XT 16Gb GFX SETTINGS: 2560x1600 32Bit color [where possible], ULTRA+ settings, Anti-aliasing is turned OFF COMPUTER TESTBEDS: [1] ► Threadripper 1950X / Asrock Taichi X399M / 64Gb DDR4 2667@2800Mhz / Radeon VII 16Gb [2] ► Threadripper 1950X / Asrock Taichi X399M / 64Gb DDR4 2667@2800Mhz / Radeon 6900XT 16Gb [3] ► Ryzen 3 3100 @3.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FASTEST AMD-BASED CARDS FOR LEGACY WINDOWS 98/2000/XP/7</title>
      <link>https://teachedu.name/news/fastest-amd-based-cards-for-legacy-windows-98-2000-xp-7/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://teachedu.name/news/fastest-amd-based-cards-for-legacy-windows-98-2000-xp-7/</guid>
      <description>Quick breakdown of the most powerful AMD-based cards for legacy operating systems.&#xA;[X850XT PE] ► WINDOWS 98 [official drivers]/ Omega drivers] [HD 3870 X 2] ► WINDOWS 2000 [official drivers] plus some INF tinkering, will review that one later on [HD 5970] ► WINDOWS 2000 [Blackwingcat hacks] [R9 270X] ► WINDOWS XP [official drivers] [6950XT] ► WINDOWS 7 [official drivers] ◄ currently rocking on that one under Windows 7 wing.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
